Saturday, January 14, 2012

Comrade Obama?

By Capt. Fogg


I must disagree with Bill Maher that Rick Santorum thinks of gay sex more than a dildo salesman but only because Rick Santorum doesn't actually think, unless one defines that word very loosely. He doesn't remember things too well either and I say that in all generosity since one might interpret the things he says he remembers as outright lies. They aren't even up to date lies or original lies or good lies, yet there are always enough misinformed, low intelligence dung flingers in fatuously faith based America to believe them and make this country seem like the primate house at the world's largest zoo.

Take Santorum's tired repetition of John McCain's 2001 attempt to sell the embarrassingly ridiculous notion that President Obama wants to redistribute the nation's wealth in some Socialistic way, a bit like Jed Clampett arriving at the Royal Wedding in his beat up old truck . Coming from a Republican, whose party has engineered what might be one of the largest upward redistribution of wealth, that's already laughable but Mr. Rick seems to be the last man standing who is still driving that rusty jalopy -- the idea that Our president, beset by critics calling him a corporate whore and a sell-out to Wall Street is a radical socialist and perhaps a communist to boot. What Santorum claims to remember is that Obama supported a constitutional amendment to give your money to the poor ( read black people) when what the president really said in a 2001 interview was that the
"Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution. . .”
Essential constraints -- it sounds very little like a man who is deploring those constraints. Indeed when Obama said the court had limited itself to insuring that he could eat at a lunch counter as long as he could afford to pay for his lunch, only a stupid man who thinks other people are even more stupid would interpret, or should I say twist, this as a quote from the Communist Manifesto.

"In the interview, Obama went into extensive detail to explain why the courts should not get into that business of ‘redistributing’ wealth. Obama’s point — and what he called a tragedy — was that legal victories in the civil rights led too many people to rely on the courts to change society for the better. That view is shared by conservative judges and legal scholars across the country."
said Obama spokesman Bill Burton during the 2008 campaign. Certainly no development since then has given credibility to McCain's sad attempt or justification for Santorum's calumnies.

I'm finding it difficult, even without the waves of nausea and loathing, to accept that any candidate could have got as far as Santorum has without being laughed out of town as a cheap, incompetent liar and unscrupulous scoundrel. I can only blame the media ringmasters who continue to provide this charlatan with his own ring in this sad and tawdry circus we call a campaign. Have we forgotten that the purpose of news reporting is to sort truth from rumor, slander and lies? Perhaps we have and it's certainly been a long time since the news was anything but a way for big news corporations and their sponsors to make money. Perhaps we should stop making them richer by occupying Wall Street and start occupying CNN and Fox and the rest instead.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

3 Comments:

Blogger Libby Spencer said...

Fogg! Was just thinking last night that I haven't seen you and was missing you. Well said as always Captain.

Also been thinking if there was some way to make the media pay a price for promoting lies, and/or allowing them to be spewed unchallenged, the coverage would change. But how? I mean, aren't too many who are going to boycott them altogether. We always get sucked back in when they occasionally post something worthwhile.

1:01:00 PM  
Blogger Capt. Fogg said...

The media propaganda circus is far too advanced in its ability to lead us around like puppets for us to do much about it, although efforts to address advertisers have shown some promise -- recall the public opprobrium about Glenn Beck. But I can't disregard the stupid factor. Most Americans aren't astute or even sober when they watch the evening circus and of course anger sells. We're all adrenaline addicts and truth bores us.

But I don't want to sound hopeful, because I'm not. I'm quite convinced that the empire is dissolving and because it now depends as much on our massive weaponry, if not more, as it does on moral and economic suasion, it's a bit scary.

I'd make the cliche comparisons to Rome, but in our case the barbarians are us, not some invading Visigoths.

10:12:00 AM  
Blogger Libby Spencer said...

Sadly true.

3:41:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home